|
||||
Once Again, We're Number One!According to the FY 2007 report by the Department of the Interior's National Park Service, which oversees both the National Register and the federal historic rehabilitation tax credit program, Missouri once again ranks
Our ranking isn't happenstance. According to the NPS, Missouri
In the FY2004 report, the NPS stated that success of the historic rehab tax credit program created by Missouri's General Assembly in 1997, "is reflected in the fact that rehabilitation using the federal tax credits doubled" after the introduction of the state tax credits. The National Park Service report points out not only that Missouri's ranking in these federal figures demonstrates the impact of the existence of the state tax credit on the use of the federal tax credits, but also that it is this winning combination that has enticed developers from other states to join local developers in hiring workers to rehab historic buildings in communities across Missouri! Thanks to the two programs, underutilized buildings have found new life and Missouri's citizens new jobs in Arcadia, Boonville, Butler, California, Carthage, Chesterfield, Chillicothe, Clarksville, Columbia, Danville, Excelsior, Farmington, Florissant, Fulton, Hannibal, Hartsburg, Hermann, Independence, Jefferson City, Joplin, Kansas City, King City, Kirkwood, Lexington, Manchester, Maplewood, Neosho, Nevada, New Haven, New Melle, North Kansas City, Osceola, Pilot Grove, Rocheport, St. Charles, St. Joseph, St. Louis, Ste. Genevieve, Sedalia, Springfield, Trenton, University City, Wellston, West Plains and Wildwood! Another study recently completed by the Center for Urban Policy Research at Rutgers University, confirms that historic preservation isn't just preserving Missouri's aesthetic and cultural heritage it's increasing economic activity by over a billion dollars a year! According to the Rutgers study, the state's average investment of $25 million per year in historic preservation tax credits helps stimulate
The same study calculated the indirect impacts of those expenditures on Missouri's economy, including:
Want to learn more?
|
||||
